logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2013.10.11 2013고단2003
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 01:00 on February 3, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Dokju) driving a Cknife vehicle parked on the street front of the dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, which started from the direction of mooring at the Dong-dong and Dong-dong.

At the same time, there is only a single-line side, and there was a lack of light around the street at night, and there was a duty of care to prevent traffic accidents in advance due to safety driving, such as checking whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is a person who is in charge of driving a motor vehicle by checking well the front side and the left side of the motor vehicle, as the victim D (n, 60 years old) was unaware of the defendant, and the victim D (n, 60 years old) was in front of the driver's vehicle.

그럼에도, 피고인은 이를 게을리 한 채 차량의 미등만 켠 상태에서 좌우를 확인하지 아니하고 핸들을 우측으로 틀면서 그대로 진행한 과실로 위와 같이 피고인의 차량 우측 옆에 서있던 피해자 D을 발견하지 못하고 그대로 충격하여 도로상에 넘어뜨린 후 우측 앞, 뒤 바퀴 부분으로 역과하였다.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, caused the death of the victim at the seat due to the 119 first responder, etc. who was dispatched to the site due to the Defendant’s report, operated his vehicle to the 119 first responder, etc. who was sent to the site due to the Defendant’s accident, and went through the vicinity of the site, as if he had discovered the victim who already used the vehicle in another vehicle, and did not inform the victim of the fact that he was sent to the E Hospital emergency room on board the vehicle and sent the vehicle, and did not inform the fact that he caused the accident.

2. The defendant who violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is the owner of the above CF vehicle, and is not insured by mandatory insurance.

arrow