logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.13 2017나12737
양수금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) except where “the right to collateral security loan (hereinafter “instant loan”) pursuant to the instant 2 and 3 loans agreement” is deemed as “the right to collateral security (hereinafter “instant loan”) and the right to collateral security (hereinafter “instant loan”) pursuant to the instant 2 and 3 loans agreement,” the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance; (b) thus, it is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance and witness G of the trial, the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed on the ground that, at the time of filing an application for voluntary auction of the instant real estate, the Nong Bank is a right to collateral security (right to collateral security) loan pursuant to the instant 2 and 3 loans agreement, including the instant one loan claim, and the agreement on debt exemption between the Plaintiff and the Defendant was not prepared, but it is difficult to change the facts and judgment recognized by the court of first instance solely on the above facts of recognition. The Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed on the ground that there is no reason.

arrow