1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. The circumstances surrounding the instant accident are as follows.

On October 30, 2017, at the time of the accident, the insured vehicle CD of the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle, and around 18:55 on October 30, 2017, at the time of the accident, parked in the instant intersection where the collision occurred in front of the F in Seocho-gu Seoul at the location of Seocho-gu, and where the Plaintiff’s vehicle was parked in order to keep straight ahead of the Plaintiff’s vehicle in front at the three-lanes where the right-hand mark is installed, while the Defendant’s vehicle proceeding behind the Plaintiff’s vehicle is proceeding to the right-hand side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle in order to turn back the vehicle back to the right-hand side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and stopped on the left-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle, KRW 50,000 for self-paid self-paid vehicle loss insured.

B. The judgment of the first instance court judged the fault ratio of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Defendant’s vehicle as 30:70, and calculated the Plaintiff’s amount of reimbursement as KRW 1,565,000.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap 1 to 4

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The instant accident occurred entirely by the Defendant’s vehicle’s negligence by unduly bypassing the distance between the Defendant’s vehicle and the Plaintiff’s vehicle without properly examining the distance between the Defendant’s vehicle. Thus, the negligence of the Plaintiff’s vehicle ought to be deemed 0%. 2) The instant accident is reasonable in the judgment of the first instance court which assessed the Plaintiff’s vehicle’s negligence by the negligence because the Defendant’s negligence and the Defendant’s vehicle, the kind of safety signs, the method of delivery, the place where the Plaintiff’s vehicle is installed, the standard, and the sign board (related to Articles 8(2) and 11 subparag. 1) of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act (Article 8(2) and Article 11 subparag. 1).

B. According to the images of the evidence No. 5, the Plaintiff’s vehicle stops.