The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (three years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is reasonable in full view of various factors, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, relationship with victims, motive, means, results, and conditions for sentencing, including driving under the condition that blood alcohol concentration reaches 0.14% or more, and the victim is a majority of the larceny and fraud, and no damage recovery or agreement is reached at all even though the amount of damage is high. The judgment of the court below already determined the punishment in full consideration of the above circumstances, and there is no change of circumstances that may differ from the judgment of the court below, and there is no other change of circumstances that can be different from the punishment of the court below. In full view of the following factors: the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, relationship with victims, motive, means, results, and circumstances after the crime of this case, the punishment of the court below is reasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.