1. The part concerning the claim for acquisition, such as automobile tax and administrative fine, among the lawsuits in this case shall be dismissed.

2. The defendant is against the plaintiff.

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Judgment with no applicable provisions of Acts (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. The Plaintiff partially dismissed claims that the Defendant accept automobile tax and various administrative fines imposed after the date of sale on the motor vehicles listed in the separate sheet.

However, if the above claim is a performance suit seeking monetary payment against the defendant, the amount would not be specified, and if it is a lawsuit seeking confirmation of the defendant's obligation to pay the above automobile tax and fine for negligence, it is difficult to view that there exists a benefit of confirmation (the judgment of this case is effective only between the plaintiff and the defendant, and it does not extend to the State or a local government. As such, even if the plaintiff received the aforementioned confirmation judgment, its obligor is not changed to the defendant in relation to the administrative agency imposing automobile tax and fine for negligence, etc.). The above claim part