logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.09.04 2017노335
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

According to the records, the defendant, who is dissatisfied with the judgment of the court below, filed an appeal on May 31, 2017, and the defendant, on June 20, 2017, received the notice of receipt of the records of trial from this court on June 20, 2017, but failed to submit the statement of reasons for appeal within the submission period under Article 361-3(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The defendant's petition of appeal does not state the reasons for appeal, and the record does not indicate the reasons for ex officio examination even after examining the records.

Therefore, pursuant to Articles 361-4(1) and 361-3(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defendant's appeal shall be dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court below [Provided, That since it is evident that the application of the law to the judgment of the first instance was omitted with respect to the ordinary concurrence, the application of the law to the third column of the judgment of the first instance court pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure shall be corrected by adding "1. Commercial concurrence" and "Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act" to the column of the application of the law to the judgment of the third instance ex officio pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.

arrow