(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.10.05 2017나6821 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.10.05 2017나6821

부당이득금

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff filed a judgment against the defendants and the co-defendant D in the first instance court, as stated in the purport of the claim. The first instance court accepted only the part of the plaintiff's claim against the plaintiff's dispute resolution committee.

As to this, the Plaintiff appealed only to the claim against Defendant B Farming Cooperatives (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Association”) and to the claim stated in the claim(a) of the claim against Defendant C Co., Ltd., and the Defendants and D Co., Ltd. did not appeal.

Therefore, since the Plaintiff’s claim against the Plaintiff and the claim as stated in item (b) against Defendant C-A-B-B-A-B-B-B-B-B-B-C-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B

A. On October 26, 2010, Defendant C Co., Ltd entered into a contract with the Defendant Cooperative for construction works related to the “Saeman E Support Project” (hereinafter “instant construction works”) in the amount of KRW 427,900,000 for construction cost, and entered into a contract with the Plaintiff Cooperative for construction works among the said construction works in the amount of KRW 17,380,000 for construction cost.

B. The Korea Development Bank had a sole proprietor F carry out the aforesaid reinforced concrete construction, and the Plaintiff was a worker employed by the said F.

C. On the other hand, the above "Seman E Support Project" paid the cost of the instant construction to the State-subsidized Project for the Defendant Cooperative.

[Ground for Recognition: Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, and 5 (including a branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply)

(ii) Eul evidence 1, Eul 1 to 2, each entry of Eul 1 to 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

3. The assertion and judgment

A. On November 2010, the Plaintiff asserted that when G representative G of the Defendant Union and the head of the field office of the Defendant C-A-A-A-A-A-B-A-A-B-A-B-A-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-D-B-B-D-B-B-B-B-D-B-B-D-B-B-B-D-B-B-B-B-B

The Defendants, May 26, 201, on the instant construction cost, 492,90.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2015.01.16 2014나8116

-전주지방법원 2014.08.22 2012가단589

-대구지방법원 2018.04.18 2017나315954

-대전지방법원 2017.04.14 2016나107736

-광주지방법원 2016.04.27 2015고단5156