A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 29, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court) and two years of suspension of execution on August 6, 2014, and its judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Fraud against victim D;

A. The Defendant is a building owner who built G lending on the site located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E and F (hereinafter “instant site”).

On November 18, 201, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, made a false statement that “When investing KRW 70,000,000,000 in loan construction business, the Defendant sold the loan to the victim D after five to six months, plus KRW 20,000,000,000,000,000,000 in total, and immediately after investing, the Defendant created a collateral security in the instant site, which is the site for loan construction, the first priority. Therefore, the Defendant would not cause damage to the Party even if the construction of loan was wrong.”

However, on November 18, 2011, the Defendant transferred the ownership of the instant site to I who is the trustee of the Defendant, and on the same day, Seongbuk-gu Seoul E site set up the first priority collective security right of KRW 468 million in the future of the new mental cooperative. On the same day, Seongbuk-gu Seoul F site set up the first priority collective security right of KRW 247 million in the future of the new credit cooperative, the first priority collective security right of KRW 468 million in the future of the new credit cooperative, and the first priority collective security right of KRW 468 million in the future of the new credit cooperative, in the future of the new credit cooperative, and purchased the instant site with a financial institution without any particular fund, while proceeding with three construction sites at the same time, there was no intention or ability to set up the instant collective security right on the instant site as promised by the victim, and there was no intention or ability to return it.

As such, the Defendant deceivings the victim, and up to November 18, 201, from the victim to whom it belongs, KRW 50 million is the name of the investment, and around November 23, 201.