Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving a rocketing taxi.

At around 15:20 on May 9, 2014, the Defendant continued to run a nives shooting distance from the nives of the river to the nives of the Annives of the river.

Since there is a signal apparatus installed, the defendant who drives a motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the new code and prevent the accident from smoke.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the victim to go beyond the victim due to the negligence of violating the signal by driving the victim D(35 years of age) in accordance with the green signals, the lower part of the right side of the EW C650GT Orala, which is driven by the victim D (35 years of age), to go beyond the victim.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a thring of 8 weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement on the occurrence of D traffic accidents;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Place and photograph of the accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (the fact that the defendant is against the defendant, the fact that the defendant has agreed smoothly with the victim, the taxi of the defendant is admitted to the taxi mutual aid association, the fact that the defendant has no record of being punished for traffic crimes from around 2005, the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant);