A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant works together with the victim C and the insurance company agency.

Defendant,

1. On June 26, 2012, the Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Party D located in Seodaemun-gu “E” legal party, “E”, “F paid a mutual aid payment in the name of the mother and her children to the fraternity that is the subject of the guidance, and there is a need for the mother and her children to give the extension payment first, and the mother would be entitled to the said mother’s interest and return the said money again if he/she paid the money to this mother.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, the defendant did not have the ability to pay it immediately.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and up to eight million won on the same day from the victim.

3. 2.5 million won, and the same month;

5. The sum of 200,000 won is 10,000 won under the name of the criminal defendant;

2. On July 8, 2012, in the Defendant’s residence located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Plaintiff had directors D in Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and the remainder of D three million won is insufficient, and the husband has to pay money, and only if he/she lends his/her her her son, he/she may immediately be allowed to lend his/her her

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, the defendant did not have the ability to pay it immediately.

Accordingly, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and receives three million won from the victim to the account under the name of the Defendant on the same day.

3. On July 31, 2012, in the “E” legal party located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, “E”, the victim made a false statement to the effect that he/she borrowed the money from the Plaintiff and borrowed the money from the Plaintiff and borrowed the money from the Plaintiff.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim, the defendant did not have the ability to pay it immediately.

Accordingly, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above and received five million won from the victim’s account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1..