logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2020.08.20 2020고단2260
공용물건손상등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 2, 2020, at around 01:15, the Defendant damaged public goods to the extent of KRW 30,000,000,000,000,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

2. The Defendant committed an assault, such as: (a) the time and place of the obstruction of performance of official duties, at the same time and place as in paragraph (1) of this Article, that “the head of the Dong-dong Police Station B located in the Busan Dong-dong Police Station B, after receiving 112 a report that “the head of the Dong-dong Police Station is provokinging and shaking the iron of the Dong-dong Office; (b) the security guards belonging to the Busan Dong-dong Police Station B located in the Do-dong Police Station B, sing away the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant s

Accordingly, the defendant, by force, interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes related to photographs of the D statements;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires a strict punishment for the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties as an offense that interferes with the legitimate performance of official duties and disturbs the state’s public authority.

The defendant, under the influence of alcohol, has damaged articles used by public offices without justifiable grounds, and obstructed the execution of official duties by assaulting police officers dispatched after receiving 112 reports.

However, there is no criminal record exceeding a fine for the defendant, since the defendant is late, voluntarily undertaking a gold farm program, and the defendant has no criminal records.

arrow