Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On March 2007, the Defendant purchased the extraction amount from the victim G who operated a health source under the trade name of husband C, D and Eunpyeong-gu Seoul E, and expressed that the Defendant would make a false body open as if it were open, and then would borrow it from the victim to borrow it from the victim.

Accordingly, around March 22, 2007, the defendant and D found the above F in order to order the victim to extract the length from the victim. D in the following day, the victim was drinking the length extraction amount, was hospitalized in the hospital, and C was hospitalized in the hospital. The victim was called "D was hospitalized due to drug addiction," and C was called in the broadcasting station, so it was allowed to gather news in the broadcasting station, and reported even to the Gu Office of Food and Drug Administration, and the Food and Drug Administration made a report."

Defendant, C, and D threatened the victim with such intimidation, and transferred KRW 1.8 million to D’s account on March 27, 2007. On March 28, 2007, the Defendant directly received KRW 7 million from the victim as agreed money, and continued to receive KRW 200,000 from the victim on March 29, 2007.

Accordingly, the defendant, C, and D jointly got 9 million won from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second court date);

1. Statements in part of the protocol of examination of suspect to the prosecution (including substitute part) concerning C;

1. A petition, a copy of the agreement, or a letter of withdrawal of the complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a deposit slip and a medical certificate;

1. Article 2 (2) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 350 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;