Among the judgment of the first instance, the part against the plaintiff who is ordered to pay additional money shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. With respect to D vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”), the Defendant is an insurer who has concluded each automobile insurance contract for E vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicles”).

B. On January 31, 2019, around 14:45, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was damaged due to the collision between the front side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle driving ahead of the two lanes near the operating distance in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, by changing the two lanes from the front side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle driving ahead of the two lanes.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

On August 2, 2019, the Plaintiff paid insurance money of KRW 954,300 (excluding KRW 238,000) at the cost of repairing the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 1-6, 8, 9, Eul's evidence Nos. 4-6, video, the purpose of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. 1) The plaintiff asserts that "the driver of the defendant vehicle at the time of the accident in this case, at the time of the accident in this case, installed a stringer and changed the lane without taking any measures to pay attention to the driver of the vehicle in the after and without securing the safety distance, and the driver of the plaintiff vehicle could not know the existence of the stringer located in the string area, so the accident in this case should be deemed to have occurred by the negligence of the defendant vehicle." 2) The defendant asserts to the purport that "the driver of the plaintiff vehicle at the time of the accident in this case, while the driver of the vehicle at the time of the accident in this case was able to avoid the accident in this case, the driver of the plaintiff vehicle was forced to proceed with the accident in this case without giving due attention to the operation of the defendant vehicle, and the accident in this case was caused by negligence that was not caused by the occurrence of the accident in this case."

B. We examine the judgment, the above facts and the evidence, in particular, as seen earlier.