A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of five thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

From August 20, 2016 to September 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) leased two units of officetels 804 and 916 located in Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) advertised, using job offer advertisements, etc., to the said office; and (c) advertised, using the trade name “H” to the said office’s website; and (d) advertised, as the officetel’s business site, such as “G”, the Defendant reported the said advertisement to the said office; and (c) directed women, such as E and E and E, etc., to the said office, by using the sexual organ loss and entry of the male and female, etc.; and (c) reported the said advertisement to the said office as the price for commercial sex acts; and (d) notified women, such as E and E, etc., to engage in the act of similarity in a way of making an assessment by using I and J’s sexual organ loss and entry.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect concerning F by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to J, I, E, or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning internal photographs on the spot of officetels No. 804, internal photographs on the officetel No. 916, and the contents of K conversations;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging, etc. Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of a sentence of imprisonment with prison labor and the concurrent imposition of fines (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The following specific circumstances in the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the method and scale of the instant crime, the period and scale of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, family environment, and circumstances before and after the instant crime are considered, and the sentence like the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the factors indicated in the arguments.

It shows a positive attitude toward the crime and against it.

Until now, there is no criminal history.

The period of crime is not long.