Text
1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.
The defendant.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties is a company that manufactures and sells food (nurged fly flybing) and the defendant is a company that engages in the business of manufacturing industrial purification equipment.
B. On March 6, 2013, in order to reduce water supply costs, wastewater treatment costs, etc., the Plaintiff contracted to the Defendant for the production and installation of discharged water purification systems (hereinafter referred to as the “instant contract”) by purifying discharged water (water discharged from a hot-water conditioning, a water tank, and water cooling water, a water tank, the life of which is a water), and then reuse the water.
2) The main contents of the instant contract are as follows.
Construction Contract Documents
4. The outline of the device shall correspond to specifications or specifications to all the materials and devices that treat the table, foreign substances, longitude, ionod composition, etc. existing in the water treated as purified water at the site of the plaintiff so that they can be suitable for drinking water.
5. Standard 1) System design capacity: Water quality of produced water from 7 cubic meters/h (number of produced water: 7 cubic meters/hr) 2) : At least 23 hours.
6. Period of construction: From March 6, 2013 to May 10, 2013 (the installation of a 13-day site).
7. Construction cost: 87 million won (excluding surtax);
8. Contract deposit: Three remaining amounts for which no intermediate payment is made: 30%, 26.1 million won, and Map 2 attached hereto: 70%, 60.9 million won, additional tax, and three months, respectively.
9. The structure of the device and construction details 1) raw water, treated water storage tank: Article 1, capacity: 3,00 liter 7) , 1 LOT, capacity: 7m/hr, and recovery rate: at least 75% but not less than 12. The rate of exchange rate: 3/1,000 of the daily contract amount; the Plaintiff completed the construction work on June 16, 200 if the Defendant satisfies the terms of the design standards (at least 7/hr 23 cubic meters of the production capacity in conformity with the criteria for analysis and drinking water) for the discharged water reuse, manufacture, and construction work.