Text
1.(a)
Annex D B B between Defendant A and D
1. On April 12, 2006, each real estate entered in the list of "real estate".
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff’s claim 1) On September 11, 2008, the Plaintiff Company Eb&S Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “EbS”).
) Around October 31, 2008, KRW 300 million was first 3% of interest per month, and the date of maturity for payment was determined and lent as of October 31, 2008. D jointly guaranteed the above loan obligations against the Plaintiff of APS. (2) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against D as of October 31, 2012, as the Plaintiff did not receive part of the above loan, against D on October 31, 2012.
D On December 14, 2012, 2012, D rejected the claimant on the following: “D shall pay to the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 227,316,915, which is the balance of the guaranteed obligation, and KRW 36% per annum from January 12, 2010 to the date of full payment; ② KRW 339,495,923, which is the balance of the guaranteed obligation, and KRW 36% per annum from August 9, 2012 to the date of full payment.”
3) On February 6, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) based on the authentic copy of a statement of recognition with executory recognition of the foregoing guaranteed debt and loan cases, and based on the amount claimed by Seoul Southern District Court 2013TTTT2367 to KRW 875,731,936; (b) was issued against D’s Defendant A an order for the seizure and collection of claims regarding the intermediate payment and the remainder claim on April 12, 2006; (b) Defendant A received a sales contract and the ownership transfer registration lawsuit between Defendant A and D, etc. (1) on April 12, 2006 between D, E, E, F, G, and Korea Natural Training Institute (hereinafter “D, etc.”) and D, etc.
1. The sales contract was concluded to purchase each of the real estate listed in the list of "real estate" (hereinafter "each of the instant real estate") at KRW 24 billion (hereinafter "the instant sales contract"), and the down payment was paid KRW 6 billion.
2) When D et al. claimed the cancellation of the instant sales contract and refused to implement the procedures for ownership transfer registration, Defendant A et al. refused to implement the instant real estate (attached Form) against D et al. as Seoul Central District Court 2006Gahap110105 on December 26, 2006.
1...