logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2020.10.14 2019가단80448
공사대금
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Of the costs of lawsuit, the supplementary intervenor shall bear the costs of lawsuit.

Reasons

1. On June 201, 2017, the construction cost of the Plaintiff’s assertion Nos. 1 and the construction cost of the construction work is the Plaintiff’s Intervenor B, and the contractor is K (the representative L: Defendant representative director M; hereinafter “K”).

[In the absence of any dispute, Gap or 1, 2(including a paper number; hereinafter the same shall apply)

[2] On August 2017, 2017, the contractor is the Plaintiff’s Intervenor D, and the contractor is K.

[In the absence of dispute, ADa 1 and 2]. 47,000,000 on January 2, 2018, the contractor for the construction work is N who is the defendant, and the contractor is K.

[Around April 2018, the contractor cannot be recognized as having been the Defendant company as alleged by the Plaintiff solely on the basis of the evidence Nos. 10. 37,00,000,000, and the document No. 10 was written on or around April 2018. Around June 2018, the Plaintiff was awarded a subcontract for each construction work as indicated below from the Defendant, and completed the subcontract for each construction work as follows.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant construction work” according to the sequence below, and collectively referred to as “each of the instant construction works.” The Plaintiff did not receive from the Defendant the total sum of KRW 40,000,000,000, and the total sum of KRW 20,600,000,000, among the construction costs of each of the instant construction works.

Therefore, the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff the remaining construction cost of KRW 60,600,000 and damages for delay.

On the other hand, the plaintiff was directly paid KRW 71,50,000 from the defendant in relation to each of the construction costs of this case in the preparatory documents dated March 24, 2020 and in the reference documents dated October 9, 2020, and the plaintiff's supplementary intervenor who is the contractor of the first construction work, was the plaintiff's supplementary intervenor who is the contractor of the second construction work.

arrow