logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.07.06 2016나1605
관리비
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. In the first instance court, the Plaintiff filed a claim for the overdue management fee and its late payment charge against the Defendant, and the first instance court partly accepted the claim for overdue management fee and dismissed the claim for overdue charge.

The scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the part against the defendant of the above claim for overdue management expenses.

2. Basic facts

A. The Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building (hereinafter “instant commercial building”) is an aggregate building consisting of the first and sixth underground floors, and the Plaintiff is a management entity comprised of sectional owners of the instant commercial building. The Defendant leased the first floor No. 102-106 square meters (22% of the total area of the first floor; hereinafter “instant store”) of the instant commercial building on April 2013, and then “D” is operating food supply business in mutual name and occupied and used the instant store.

B. B. Before the Defendant leased the instant store, the Plaintiff separated No. 102 from the instant store and No. 102-2, and imposed and collected management expenses from the lessee. The Defendant did not pay KRW 1,402,03 in total as follows from June 2014 to March 2015.

In June 27, 2014, 27, 5706, 4931, 095, 050 132, 208, 27, 570 123, 183 A's 123,83 or 123, or 183's 123,183's 1-2, it is obvious that it is an error in the calculation of 23,183.

25,283 9,400 185,436 August 27, 2014,570 124,59 26,926,926 9,280 187,975 176,834 17,835 27,570,5748,5748,5748,275 27,575 27,578,547,57,574,57,57, 205 27,57,547,547,57, 204,57,57, 2014,57,57,57,57,57, 204,57,57,57, 2014

arrow