1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. In full view of Gap's basic facts: Gap's 1, 3, 6, 7 evidence, Eul's 1, 4 through 7, and 9 through 13; Eul's her husband's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's shares and management right from D on November 206 to the plaintiff on March 30, 2009 (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff")'s son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son and representative director

7.5. The fact that C resigned from the representative director; C, through a corrective contract on July 31, 2007, and September 13, 2007, agreed to transfer 2,028,717 shares of the Plaintiff owned by C to H 6,000 won; C, under the Plaintiff’s name on November 21, 2007, where C had not received the purchase price of shares from H, issued a cashier’s check of KRW 200,000 won for face value 190,000 won for face value and face value 1,90,000 won for face value and face value 1,00,000 won for face value and 1,00,000 won for face value and 1,000,000 won for face value and 1,000,000 won for face value and 1,000,000 won for face value and 1,000,000 won for the Defendant’s checks.

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim

A. On Nov. 21, 2007, the Plaintiff’s main claim 1) lent KRW 190 million to the Defendant on Nov. 21, 2007, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the loan amount of KRW 190 million and interest thereon. 2) The Plaintiff’s main claim No. 2 (a written agreement for a loan for consumption) is not admissible as evidence because there is no evidence to acknowledge the establishment of the authenticity, and it is difficult to use it as evidence. According to the facts acknowledged earlier.