logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.11.20 2014고단1043
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five million won.

Where the above fine is not paid, one million won shall be converted into one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 22:00 on September 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed that, “A restaurant operated by the victim D in Gumi-si, would have been under influence of alcohol to F, an employee of the above restaurant without any justifiable reason; (b) “I am ye and B,” and “I am sye and I am sye and I am am sye and I am am sye; (c) I am sye and I am sye and I am do not do not do so; and (d) I am sye and I am am sye and I am am am sye and am syebbbbbbbling,” and the victim cannot enter the above restaurant by 22:30 on the same day.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. At around 22:30 on September 11, 2014, the Defendant, on the ground that he received a 112 report from the proprietor of the instant E cafeteria, who was sent to the Defendant, and received a recommendation to return home from the victim H, an assistant affiliated with the Gu American Police Station G police box, which was called the victim of the instant cafeteria, and, on the ground that he received a recommendation to return home from the victim H, who was an assistant affiliated with the Defendant, of the said cafeteria, and that he was heard by the owner of the instant cafeteria, employee F, and I, the Defendant sexually insultingd the victim with the victim’s body as “Iri spath, spath, spath, and spathed.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (a mark to handle the 112 Reporting Cases), and to report internal investigation (a service log at night);

1. Considering the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act as to the crime, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of insult), and multiple kinds of criminal records of the accused who choose each fine, a strict punishment should be imposed. However, not only the victim of interference with business but also the above employee F, are also agreed with the police officer, and the same is committed in depth with the insulting police officer.

arrow