The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In determining the facts, the victim, who was not suitable for the original flusium, is extracted from flusium by her own after being abused from the Defendant, and there is no causal link with the Defendant.

The judgment of the court below which judged that the above spathy was a assault against the defendant is erroneous in misconception of facts.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실오인 주장에 대하여 원심 및 당심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사실 및 사정, 즉 ① 피고인이 피해자의 왼쪽 빰을 때린 사실을 인정하고 있는 점, ②피해자는 피고인으로부터 얼굴을 1회 맞았고 이로 인하여 왼쪽 위 어금니 1개가 빠졌다는 취지로 진술한 점(수사기록 24, 25쪽), ③ 피해자는 상악 좌측 제2대구치 탈구가 있다는 이유로 2018. 11. 19.부터 치료를 받았고 이와 관련된 진단서를 제출한 점, ④당심 증인 N의 증언은 위 폭행 이전 피해자의 치아 상태가 좋지 않았다는 취지로 위 치아 탈구가 피고인의 폭행으로 인하여 생긴 것을 부정하는 증거로 사용하기는 어렵다고 보이는 점 등을 종합하면, 원심 판시 피해자의 치아 탈구는 피고인의 폭행으로 인하여 생긴 것이라고 인정된다.

On a different premise, there is no reason to misunderstanding of facts by the accused.

B. As to the assertion of unfair sentencing, it is unfavorable that the instant crime was committed during the period of suspension of execution and probation, and that the degree of injury is not minor.

At present, the period of suspended execution is too excessive, the defendant is also subject to violence from the victim, the victim is not punished by the victim by agreement with the victim in the trial, the victim's situation seems not to be good before the assault is committed, and the removal of the steel trial is to be conducted.