The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant had the mind that the defendant stolen the property by entering the home plug, which is the large feet.

In the state that the Defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to dementia, at around 15:50 on November 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) used a gap in which surveillance of the victim’s home display C (the age of 21) was neglected; and (b) used a gap in the victim’s home display C’s market value of 11,580 won at the display for sale; and (c) used a lux in the multiple lux in the market value of 5,490 won at the market value of 25,80 won at the market value; and (d) used a lux in the lux of 42,870 won at the lux in the lux of 15,580 won at the market value.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 10 (2) and (1) and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of mental illness and injury (person with mental disability);

1. Penalty fine of 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (It is reasonable to see that the crime was committed in a state of mental disorder with dementia, and considering such factors as the amount of damage is insignificant and the agreement is reached with the victim);