Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On March 1, 2016, the Defendant, at around 22:00 on March 1, 2016, went in a taxi driven by the victim B (57 tax) from the U.S. child in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and arrived at a triangulation area located in 205 as of the same day, the purpose of which is around 22:20 on the same day, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Yongsan River, which is for the purpose of 22:20 and 200 on the same day, used the victim to refrain from paying the fee at the place and to demand the payment of the fee, and used the victim's shoulder and elbow with the bank and elbus that the felbus had been making a demand
2. Grounds for dismissing public prosecution;
(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act;
(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.
C. On April 18, 2016, when the victim B was prosecuted, the victim B expressed his/her wish to punish.
(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;