Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the head of the Construction Management Group employed by the “B” of the integrated architect office, and the victim C ( South, 43 years old) is the representative director of the “B”.

The defendant, at around 12:45 on August 4, 2020, will be punished for a dispute with the victim due to his duties within the Dwork Management Performance Office in the Dong-dong 210 Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, 210.

In addition, personal data on the Nowon-gu computer that he used in his office were stored in the Nowon-gu computer, which led to returning them again, but the victim would not bring them back to Nowon-gu.

A defectrified Samsung Nowon-North Korea was laid down on the floor and broken down.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property equivalent to 500,000 won at the market price owned by the victim and damaged its utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the Defendant’s legal statement C in the field, and to the victim of the damaged photographic photo, video CDs, and to the photograph of the video images taken;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order dismissed part of the charge, the Defendant, following the Defendant’s act of stating the facts constituting the crime, carried the shoulder North of Korea into one’s low-speed car capacity and was seated in the driver’s seat before the office is located, and the Defendant assaulted twice the victim’s bridge side of the victim’s bridge that the victim continued to have his lapt North of Korea, opened the lapt, opened the lapt in the front of the office, and opened the lapt in the front of the office.

2. This part of the facts charged is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the written application for non-compliance with the preparation of a victim submitted to the court after the institution of the instant prosecution, it is recognized that the victim expressed his/her intent not to punish the defendant.

Therefore, according to Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.