logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.08.26 2015고단636
공공단체등위탁선거에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is three members of C, C members of C, and E is a candidate for C head of the cooperative in an election of head of the national Dong-si Partnership held on March 11, 2015.

No one shall offer, express an intention to offer, or promise to offer money, goods, entertainment, other economic benefits, or public or private positions to an elector, his/her family member, or an institution, organization, or facility established or operated by the elector, his/her family member, or an elector or his/her family member in connection with an election of the head

On March 9, 2015, the Defendant found D’s residence located in the Kimcheon-si F around 09:00, and found D, “I will get the president of the cooperative, who will be on board and cast a vote more than once in E”, and 50,000 won totaling 6 copies of 50,000 won.

Accordingly, the defendant provided money to the elector for the purpose of election campaign.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement by the prosecution concerning D;

1. Each investigation report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Article 59 of the relevant Act on Criminal Facts and Articles 35 (2) of the Act on Elections Commissioned by Public Organizations, etc. Selection of Punishments;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is an act that may impair the fairness of election for the president of a cooperative, and is an act that may compromise the fairness of election for the president of a cooperative, thereby respecting the autonomy of public organizations, etc. while respecting the autonomy of elections in a clean and fair manner, and thus contributing to the sound development of public organizations, etc. and the development of a democratic society. However, in light of the legislative intent of the Act on Entrusted Elections, the crime of this case is not less light of the nature of the crime in light of the legislative intent of the Act on Entrusted Elections, such as public organizations, etc., established with the aim

arrow