logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.10.24 2013고단1546
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 8, 2013, at around 18:28, the Defendant driven a Crenren car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.183% from the Do in front of the construction site located in the Do of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Gwangju to approximately 77-12, the lowest 77-12 Sinan-dong, Busan to the roads in front of the Busan City, the Do.

2. A violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.A.) on July 18, 2013, the Defendant driving a Crenren Car on the car volume on July 18, 2013, thereby proceeding about 40 km from the direction of the Sinpo-Eup in Gwangju City to the Sinpo-Eup in the speed of about 40 km along two lanes from the direction of the Sinpo-Eup in Gwangju City.

At that time, there are two lanes in which vehicle traffic volume is high, so there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering gear and accurately manipulating the steering gear for the driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded at a speed without reducing the speed, and received the part of the front part of the car of the victim D (ma, 53 years old), who was waiting in the front of the signal, following the Epoter vehicle of the victim D (ma, 53 years old), who was waiting in the front.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, sustained bodily injury, such as fluoral salt, which requires medical treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, 227,366 won of repair costs, did not stop the vehicle to the extent of 27,366 won, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act operated a Crens car quantity not covered by mandatory insurance at the date and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A traffic accident report and a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Exemplary drivers;

arrow