logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.02.05 2019누56120
검사임용불합격처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

If facts recognized in the main claim part of the judgment of the court of first instance are compared and compared to the grounds for its recognition, the fact-finding of the judgment of the court of first instance and the judgment based thereon are justified.

This is also the same in addition to the evidence submitted by the first instance court, including the statement of Gap evidence Nos. 13 and Gap evidence No. 19, submitted by the plaintiff in the appellate trial.

Accordingly, pursuant to Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, the main claim of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited for this decision.

Therefore, the plaintiff's primary claim should be dismissed as there is no reasonable ground.

The main claim in the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow