1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal or addition of part of the judgment of the first instance as follows. Thus, this court's explanation of this case is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or additional parts] The second part of the second part of the 14th part is considered to be “production”.

The second part of the 16th sentence is "performance of obligation" as "the Product Liability Act".

Part 2, “A” of Part 18 is added to “A” following

The 3th page 4 and 5 are as follows: “The Plaintiff, who did not receive the 3th page 4 and 5, seems to have failed to have been aware of the product connection method and cautions.”

Part 3 added "D. 13 208 : 2,745,600 won (=4,576,000 x 60%)" to the following actions of Part 15.

Part 4. The following shall be added to the second activity:

3. According to the theory of lawsuit, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 6,945,60 (i.e., KRW 1,980,000, KRW 720,000, KRW 2,745,600) and, among those, KRW 1,980,00, the amount of the award in the first instance as of September 30, 201, KRW 720,000, which is the amount of the award in the first instance judgment, from September 29, 2011 to November 19, 2011, KRW 1,50,000, the amount of KRW 2,745,600, which is the annual interest rate of KRW 1,95,000, which is the amount of the award in the first instance judgment, until August 25, 2014, which is the date on which each Defendant raised a dispute.

"In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance has different conclusions.