logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.07.15 2015고단2421
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 2009, the Defendant, at the office of the suspect who was not a director of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, sold the victim D’s “EM” amount to KRW 80,000,000 ( KRW 80,000 per unit) to the victim.

1. On July 2009, the Defendant was demanded to sell at around 80,000 won the above 80 amusement machines sold from the injured party at the above office around July 2009.

On October 26, 2009, the Defendant sold 15 out of the above entertainment machine to a person with no name. On October 26, 2009, the Defendant transferred 12 million won (1.8 million won per unit) to the account in the name of H, the wife of the victim, using the agricultural bank account in the name of F (G) in the name of the Defendant’s wife.

On December 2, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The remaining 65 amusement machines are kept in custody, and the sales proceeds will be paid to H after selling the remaining 65 amusement machines,” by telephone at a place without any change.

However, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the sales proceeds to H even if he/she received the remainder amusement from the injured party.

On December 2, 2009, the Defendant received orders from the wife of the victim, from the victim H, the amount of KRW 52 million (80,000,000 per unit x 65 unit x 1 unit x 805 unit) at the market value of the container near the Daegu-gu mountain village market.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. The Defendant committed a crime regarding “entertainment Program Development Costs” with the victim’s office located in the Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, on July 7, 2009, with the victim’s “making a entertainment program and making a lot of profits if the business was conducted.”

The term "to create a entertainment program on the face of the development cost" was false.

However, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to develop entertainment programs even if he/she received development expenses from the injured party.

The defendant is the defendant's wife on October 26, 2000 won from the injured party, and on December 1, 2000 won from the injured party.

arrow