logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.06.27 2017나15790
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the ground for the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the court of first instance, except for adding “the defendant hospital of the plaintiff to the plaintiff in 2005 and around 2006,” which was submitted in the instant case under Section 14, of the third and fourth of the judgment

[In order to recognize the liability for damages due to medical acts, at least the victim must prove the existence of medical negligence. However, even if the evidence was presented by the court of first instance after the court duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance, it is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the plaintiff received the instant surgery at the defendant hospital or that the defendant committed the medical negligence to the plaintiff at around 2009, as alleged by the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the fact-finding and judgment at the court of first instance is just, and there is no error as alleged by the plaintiff as the ground for appeal by the plaintiff.

arrow