logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.10.15 2020고단4210
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 2, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. at the Incheon District Court on October 2, 2006, and was issued a summary order of one million won by the same court on August 2, 2013.

On August 4, 2020, at around 06:04, the Defendant driven an Esch Rexton car in the state of alcohol with approximately 3km alcohol concentration of about 0.230% from the 3km section from the roads adjacent to the Gwangju Northern District B market to the roads adjacent to the D stations in the same Gu C.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Requests for appraisal;

1. Previous records: Criminal records, etc., inquiry reports, written judgments, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning summary orders;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing period of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act includes the defendant's records of the same crime, blood alcohol concentration at the time of the crime of this case, the circumstances leading to the drunk driving, the distance and place where the defendant was drunk driving, and the fact that the defendant is divided into his mistake, and other sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, character and conduct of the defendant, and circumstances before and after the crime of this case, shall be determined as ordered.

arrow