logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.23 2017고정3040
청소년보호법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. No person who is the summary of the facts charged shall sell alcoholic beverages that are harmful to juveniles to juveniles;

Nevertheless, around 00:30 on June 12, 2017, the Defendant received KRW 12,000 per week from the main point of “C” in the Defendant’s operation, which was located in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City B B, as a customer, D (16 years), E (17 years old), F (16 years old), G (16 years old), and H (17 years old).

As a result, the defendant sold alcohol, which is a drug harmful to juveniles, to the above juveniles.

2. Determination

A. On the day of the instant case, the Defendant confirmed that he was an adult by conducting an identification card inspection when D and E was first entered with other friendships, and demanded F, etc. to provide identification cards even if he was found to have re-entered with F, G, and H after leaving the place of diving, but did not bring about the identification card to F, etc.

In addition, it was found that there was no intention to sell alcohol to minors because the number of people with less resident registration number was entered in adult resident registration number.

The argument is asserted.

B. The evidence that corresponds to the facts charged in the instant case is each statement at each investigative agency of D, E, F, G, and H.

D et al. prepared a written statement at an investigative agency stating that “at first entering the investigative agency, there is a fact of freely entering and drinking alcohol without an identification card inspection.”

(c)

However, D et al. stated to the effect that they cannot reverse or associate with some of the statements as follows. In light of the following statements, it is difficult to believe each of the statements made by an investigative agency as they are.

1. D There is an entry between them even before such establishment is made.

D, E and two other persons entered the same, and the two persons were sent first, and five persons were returned together with F, G, and H.

At the first time, (or from the defendant) the resident registration certificate has been requested but has not been received.

did not show while doing so.

The former stated that he received a request for identification card and entered his age in the adult resident registration number.

② E is three to four times even before this shop.

arrow