logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.13 2016고정1519
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a taxi for the purpose of large-line transportation (state) C Launa business.

On March 23, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of 15:30 on March 23, 2016, and proceeded at a speed of 222 lanes between the 5-lanes in the direction of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the 5-lanes in the direction of the Seocho-gu.

At all times, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed for a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle along an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, to check whether there is a motor vehicle passing through the intersection by checking well the right and the right and the right of the road, and to prevent the accident in advance by driving safely according to the traffic signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded without disregarding the red signal that is a stop signal, and caused the collision between the right part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle and the wheels, etc. with the front part of the 2.0 vehicle driven by the victim E, which was driven by the victim E in accordance with normal signals according to the two lanes in the direction D in the direction in the direction of the masthead.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E in the above occupational negligence, such as the right dog and the fluoral base for approximately two weeks of therapy, and the victim G, who is the fluor of the above damaged vehicle, for about two weeks of therapy, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A E-document;

1. Application of each medical certificate, accident vehicle photographing statute;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow