1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the part which is dismissed or added as set forth in paragraph (2) below or as set forth in paragraph (3). Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as

2. The second half of the judgment of the first instance court in which the second half of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as follows: “The two parties do not raise any objection.”

From the fifth 8th 8th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th, “this part of the above subordinate th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th

3. The added Plaintiffs asserts that the foregoing Exclusionary Agreement is null and void, since acceptance of the decision to recommend reconciliation in this case by the non-party union was conducted beyond the scope of delegation of the resolution at the special general meeting of the union members on November 20, 2014.

On the other hand, the decision of recommending the settlement of this case had the same effect as the final and conclusive judgment pursuant to Articles 231, 226, and 220 of the Civil Procedure Act. In such a case, the decision of recommending the settlement of this case cannot be asserted as null and void unless the decision of recommending the settlement of this case is an action for quasi-deliberation under Article 461 of the Civil Procedure Act. Thus, the plaintiffs' assertion of invalidation as to the above sub-committee agreement which became the content of the decision of recommending the settlement of this case is rejected

4. The judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiffs' appeal is justified.