beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for one year and two months, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B On January 28, 2011, the Cheongju District Court sentenced one year and six months to imprisonment for fraud, etc., and terminated the enforcement of the sentence on April 5, 2012. On October 15, 2010, the Defendant A sentenced six months to imprisonment for a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act at the Cheongju District Court on December 18, 2010.
1. The Defendants are siblings.
Defendant
B did not have any land compensation to be received from Sungnam-si, Defendant B: “The 13.6 billion won of the land compensation amounting to KRW 13.6 billion is paid; the expenses are required to be loaned; when the 100 million is loaned; the 3.0 billion of the land compensation amount is repaid to the person who borrowed the money; and the 3.0 billion of the land compensation amount is lent to the person who borrowed the money; and the 3.0 billion won of the land compensation amount is leased to the person who borrowed the money, and the 3.0 billion won of the project has been punished several times due to fraud, etc.; Defendant A was aware of the absence of any specific property; Defendant B was willing to use the above 52 million of the land compensation amount by borrowing the money to the person who borrowed the money.
In the early July 2013, the Defendants stated that “The Defendant shall be responsible for and repaid within the territory of the Republic of Korea, if the NAN LNN would have lent KRW 100,000,000 to the victim E, because the YN would have contributed to the compensation of the land 20 days after the 20th day of the death.”
However, the Defendants did not have any land compensation for 20 days after the lapse of 20 days, and there was no intention or ability to repay money from the victims even if they did not have any specific property.
Defendant
A introduced F to the victim, provided the victim's real property as security, and borrowed KRW 80 million. On July 24, 2013, A received cash of KRW 16.8 million from the victim, and delivered it to the defendant B, and had the victim wired KRW 15 million to the account in the name of G, the creditor of the defendant B.
Accordingly, the Defendants are the defendants.