logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.10.26 2016고정1834
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person using the Internet NAV carb and the following “Ara” (htp:/gora. Media.dirum.ne) as a member, and “C” as a member. On December 17, 2014, the Defendant is in the E office located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and is connected to the Internet NAV carb B’s free bulletin board as “C” and is called “F” under the title of “G (H residence, 50 second half, residence, and 40 second half, residence in Chungcheongnam-do, and 50 second half, residence in Chungcheongnam-si, and residence in Chungcheongbuk-si), and the title of “F” as “C”.

They ( these three persons) have K operator located in the original city of Gangwon-do, and have the total of 600 million won, including the equipment costs and personnel expenses, and are in escape.

G is an actual operator, and I serves as the field director, and J is a document representative.

G and J have two contacts, and I is known to be currently in Daegu (Tgu).

They are currently under legal tracking, and are likely to cause no longer damage.

(B) The Defendant, on the 22th day of the same month, posted a statement stating that “I would not cause more fraudulent damage, I would like to know.” However, the victim I et al. did not know that I had to receive 600 million won in the money that the Defendant would have to receive. Accordingly, the Defendant revealed openly false facts through the information and communications network for the purpose of slandering the victim, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation. On the 22th day of the same month, the Defendant posted a statement as described in the above paragraph (1) on the Internet, stating “L.” However, there was no fact that the victim I et al. had fleded KRW 600 million in money that the Defendant would have to receive.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public false information through information and communication networks with a view to slandering the victim.

arrow