The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the representative of the LAB.

On April 14:00 on April 20, 2019, the Defendant entered into a contract for a logistics warehouse of an amount equivalent to KRW 21,400,000 for the construction cost to D (Nam, 40 years of age) and Chungcheongnam-gu, Ulsan-si, Seoul-si, and received KRW 20,000,000 from the complainant three times as the name of the construction cost, after completing the construction.

On May 10, 2019, the complainant called the defendant to return the construction cost of one million won by telephone, but rejected the return without any reason.

2. Determination

A. The burden of proving the facts constituting an offense prosecuted in a criminal trial is to be borne by the prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on the evidence of probative value, which makes the judge feel true enough to have a reasonable doubt. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, the doubt of guilt against the defendant is more likely, even if there is no such evidence.

Even if the interests of the defendant should be judged as the interests of the defendant

(See Supreme Court Decision 2010Do9633 Decided November 11, 2010, etc.). B.

Judgment

(1) 주장 피고인은, D이 2019. 5. 3.경 피고인에게 저온 저장고가 설치된 건물의 천장 보수공사를 대금 100만 원에 추가 의뢰하여 공사를 시행하였고, D은 위 보수대금까지 포함하여 피고인에게 송금한 것이므로 피고인이 100만 원을 초과 지급받거나 횡령한 바 없다고 주장하고, 이에 대하여 D는 미리 지급한 계약금 100만 원을 제외하고 잔금 2,040만 원을 송금해야 하는데 계약금을 지급한 사실을 깜박 잊고 2,140만 원을 추가로 송금하였고, 피고인에게 100만 원을 반환해 달라고 하였으나 피고인이 공장 건물주로부터 추가 보수공사비 100만 원을 지급받지 못하였다는 이유로 반환을 거부하였다고 주장한다.

(2) There is a statement in D’s investigative agency as evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged in the instant case, but D’s statement is different.