1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A and B were co-owners of 2,00 square meters L. L. 2,00 square meters. On January 12, 2016, Plaintiff A and B were divided into 337 square meters and 73 square meters in the above land. Plaintiff C, D, E, F, G, and H were co-owners of 2,98 square meters in N field. On the same day, Plaintiff C, D, E, F, H were divided into 1,94 square meters in the above land.

(hereinafter referred to as “each land of this case” and “the remaining land of this case”) B.

The defendant Korea Rail Network Authority (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Rail Network Authority") is "the project of this case" or "the construction project of this case" or "O".

The "Land Compensation Act" is referred to as the "Land Compensation Act" to expropriate land incorporated into the project of this case, including each land of this case, in order to expropriate the land incorporated into the project of this case, including each land of this case.

The Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport has obtained project approval pursuant to Article 20, and the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport publicly announced the details of the approval P on September 22, 2015.

C. The defendant Corporation did not reach an agreement with the plaintiffs to acquire the land to be incorporated in the project of this case, and thus, the defendant Corporation is referred to as the "Defendant Committee" below the Central Land Expropriation Committee.

On October 19, 2017, the Defendant Commission filed an application for adjudication, and on October 19, 2017, the date of commencement of expropriation on each of the instant land is no more than "the adjudication of expropriation" as of November 22, 2017.

D. D.

The plaintiffs raised an objection against the above ruling of acceptance by asserting the increase in compensation, but the defendant's commission, on April 26, 2018, rejected the plaintiffs' objection. "The ruling of this case" is "the ruling of this case.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4 (which include numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply)

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. Whether the lawsuit is lawful;

A. A lawsuit against the Plaintiff’s defense prior to the merits of the Defendant Committee is brought against the Defendant Committee.