The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The reasoning of the appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant recognized the instant crime, partly restored the damage, and the health status is not good. However, even though the Defendant was punished several times due to the same kind of crime, the nature of the instant crime was poor during the repeated crime period, and did not reach an agreement with the victims. There was no special circumstance or circumstance that may be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment.

In addition, given that the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, economic condition, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime, circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is groundless.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.