logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2020.11.27 2020고정588
채권의공정한추심에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

A. The Defendant is a creditor who lent KRW 150,00,000 to B around June 22, 2015.

No debt collector shall visit an interested person in connection with a debt or cause him/her to deliver words, letters, sound, image, or articles to the interested person, except where he/she asks him/her of any method, etc. identifying the debtor's location, contact information, or location.

1. On May 9, 2020, the Defendant committed the crime on May 16:23, 2020, at an infinite city (hereinafter referred to as Changwon-si) around 16:23, 2020, a loan certificate (amount: KRW 140,00,000) received from the Defendant’s mobile phone from the Defendant’s obligor B with the Defendant’s mobile phone, and the above amount shall be in two copies per month, and the interest shall be paid on the nineth day of each month, and the principal shall be in repayment to Ha and shall be signed and sealed by Ha on the nineth day of July 13, 2016: the address of the borrower on July 13, 2016: Changwon-si, Changwon-si *******, residents’ number*********)**** the name of the debtor after taking the debtor’s spouse.

As a result, the Defendant sent words, letters, sound, image, or things to related persons in relation to the obligation.

2. On July 14, 2020, the Defendant committed the crime of July 14, 2020, around 13:40 on July 14, 2020, the Defendant called the Defendant’s spouse B to the Defendant’s office ********* at the entrance of the entrance, and called C to the Defendant’s fee staff “A-D has been represented by C and C. A-D. A.D. representative.” When communicating with the above C, the Defendant “C C.C. S only has to pay money. It is not known that there is no friencing friencing between husband and wife, and it is necessary to deny and talk. On the other hand, C.C. is a creditor’s friencing horse.”

As a result, the Defendant visited the related person in relation to the obligation, and sent words, letters, sound, image, or things to the related person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of B and C 1.

arrow