1. The plaintiffs and the plaintiff succeeding intervenors' claims against the defendants are dismissed, respectively.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties and each of the sales contracts of this case 1) Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”).

Defendant H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant H”)

(1) Defendant I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant I”).

(2) The apartment complex of 20 to 30 apartment units of 22,190 above the ground level 20 to 30 above the ground level 20 under the management-based investment trust method (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment unit”).

(2) On December 2009, the Plaintiffs jointly construct and supply the apartment of this case between Defendant H and I, and Defendant H and I are the truster of the said K’s land and the contractor of the instant apartment. (2) On December 2, 2009, the Plaintiffs were 45 square meters of the instant apartment among the apartment of this case with Defendant Crocco;

4. Each sales contract entered into as mentioned above (hereinafter “each sales contract of this case”) with the same contents as the Plaintiff’s claim list (1), (2), and (3) column, lake column, sale price column, contract deposit column, and option contract column.

B. The Plaintiffs’ intermediate payment loan attached Form

2. On March 22, 2010, each of the plaintiffs listed in the plaintiff's claim list (1) received each of the corresponding intermediate payment in the column of unpaid demand entered in the same list with the new bank, Korean bank, and Korea Exchange Bank (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the defendant's financial institution") on March 22, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as "each of the intermediate payment of this case" and each of the above loans was deposited in the account of the defendant's financial institution with the consent of the above plaintiffs.

C. On June 28, 2013, the Plaintiff’s Intervenor E, who succeeded to each of the instant sales contracts and each of the instant loan agreements, was the Plaintiff’s Intervenor E, and the Plaintiff’s Intervenor F, the Plaintiff’s Intervenor F, on June 5, 2013.