logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 영동지원 2019.07.11 2018고정42
일반교통방해
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the owner of the land B in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun.

On September 2018, the Defendant: (a) around early September 2018, the Defendant installed a pipe and its articles at a height of about 20 m high from the 2m width of the road, which is about 1m 20m in the width of the land owned by the residents of the Republic of Korea, from among the roads with a width of about 1m 2m in the width of the land, which the residents of the Republic of Korea had, from the beginning to the vicinity of the road adjacent to the land B and the road adjacent to the Defendant’s land, to set up a chill and down a down chill at the vicinity; and (b) obstructed traffic by making it impossible for the residents of the Republic of Korea not to use the cater and a light c.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. Application of a certified copy of cadastral map and each field photograph statute;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 185 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Fine of 2,00,000 won for which the sentence is suspended; and

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day converted);

1. Judgment on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act

1. The gist of the assertion lies in C, adjacent to the land owned by the Defendant, and owned by the State, and the land originally owned by the State was used as a road.

However, the part of the land owned by the above state was reduced to be used as the road due to the collapse of a part of the land, and the defendant agreed to pass through the neighboring residents as part of the land of this case from about 10 years ago.

However, in order for E, the owner of the land adjacent to the instant land, which is the owner of the instant land, to develop the said land and lay a pipe on the instant land and remove it by passing through heavy equipment, the Defendant installed a pipe and a pipe on the boundary of the instant land.

The Defendant’s land boundary of the instant land pipe and its water.

arrow