logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.03.18 2015고정2500
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a driver of the C Eth passenger car.

1. On July 17, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) was straightened from the direction of the border road toward the west-gu, Daegu north-gu, Daegu-gu, about 00:05.

In such a case, the defendant has a duty of care to safely and safely promote the traffic situation on the front side and the right side.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to operate the vehicle and received the front part of the victim D(24 years old)'s E-rayed vehicle from the victim D(24 years old), which was in the traffic signal atmosphere, from the front part of the vehicle at the e-ray shock, and had the above low-pollution vehicle f(48 years old), which was in the signal waiting at the front of the signal at the front.

Defendant 1 suffered from the victim D’s negligence in the course of the above business to the victim 20-day catum catum, etc., which requires treatment for about 20 days, and to the victim F for about 2 weeks catum catums.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) caused damage to property equivalent to KRW 9,586,50,505, following the vehicle behind the vehicle behind the vehicle's repair cost of KRW 8,767,757 due to the accident mentioned in paragraph (1) of the said Article; (b) the repair cost of KRW 818,748; and (c) the vehicle behind the vehicle's repair cost of KRW 8,586,505.

3. Although the Defendant was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road without purchasing mandatory insurance for violating the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Insurance Act, the Defendant operated the said EM motor vehicle quantity without purchasing mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of D and F;

1. Each written diagnosis and estimate about D or F;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a survey report on actual condition, and a photograph on the scene of each accident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes regarding mandatory insurance;

1. Article 3(1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the occupational and de facto occupation), Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act (the point of damage to the negligent property), and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act.

arrow