Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a broker in the “E Real Estate” located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Defendant was acting as a broker in F’s wife G, and was acting as a broker in the lease contract for multi-family housing owned by F.

However, while cancelling the above lease contract, G was subject to a lawsuit claiming the cancellation of the lease contract from H, and on October 11, 201, G was required to pay 1,500,000 won to H by the settlement recommendation decision. F and G were an issue of real estate brokerage of the Defendant who is not qualified as a licensed real estate agent, and continuously demanded the Defendant to compensate for damages, and filed a civil petition with the competent Gu office, police station, etc. due to the Defendant’s violation of the Act on the Business of Real Estate Brokerage and Report of Real Estate Transactions.

Accordingly, the above brokerage office of the defendant was subject to the disposition of business suspension on December 29, 201 and the representative I of the defendant and the brokerage office was investigated by the Gangseo Police Station.

On August 22, 2011, the Defendant did not have been assaulted by F at the above office on August 22, 2011. However, on August 23, 2011, the Defendant used the medical treatment at Hanwon on August 23, 2011, to make a false complaint with F having found the Defendant’s brokerage office several times as an assault.

On April 5, 2012, the Defendant submitted a false complaint to the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and to the effect that “F, the Defendant, at around 14:00 on August 22, 2011, was assaulting to find out as a real estate brokerage issue and take a bath, and selling his arms to the complainant at least four to five times as a drinking member, and is receiving treatment from his clinic.”

In this respect, the defendant raised Flessness.

2. Defendant B was frequently visiting the above brokerage office of Defendant A to a neighbor who has a pro rata with A, and was well aware of F as the father of F’s male and female J, who was the father of F’s male and female K, and was on August 22, 201.