1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment by the court concerning this part of the disposition is as stated in Paragraph 1 of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) The defendant made the instant disposition on the premise that it cannot be deemed that the deceased died from the pneumoconiosis or the functional disorder related thereto. However, in light of the deceased's medical history and treatment progress, the pneumoconiosis symptoms suffered from the deceased were conducted as a chronic pulmonary disease, and the pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary disease of the pneumoconiosis and its chronic pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary disease should be deemed to have been aggravated by the deceased. Therefore, the instant disposition made on a different premise is unlawful. 2) Even if the deceased died from the pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmon

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

C. The reasons for the decision of the court concerning this part are as follows: (a) the "F1" of the fourth 11th th 1 of the decision of the court of first instance is dismissed as "F2 (Obstruction of Duna)"; (b) the inquiry results on the Korean Doctor Association of the sixth d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d

3) In light of the above legal principles, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware