logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.10.27 2016고단6069
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동주거침입)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 4,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are friendly.

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. On September 12, 2016, the Defendants violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residence intrusion) came to the “F” managed by the victim E in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City on September 12, 2016, and entered the front door through the first floor entrance, and entered the rooftop.

Accordingly, the Defendants infringed on the residence managed by the victim jointly.

(b) No person who has violated the Chemicals Control Act shall inhale hallucinogenic substances that cause smoking, hallucination, or anesthesia;

At around 08:30 on September 12, 2016, the Defendants divided one “Pest (D-5250)” containing hallucinogenic substances into two plastic paper paper on the F-Roof, and put them into two plastic paper, and inhaled them for about five minutes at the entrance of vinyl, respectively.

2. On September 12, 2016, Defendant A’s sole criminal criminal defendant A tried to flee by having the Defendant arrested Defendant A as the intake of his body, stating that Defendant A, a police officer belonging to the Incheon Southern-dong Police Station G District, who was called out after having received a report of 112 on the above F rooftop on September 12, 2016, “I am going to go to, or going to, what you go to, what you go to, what you go to, and what you go to the bar.”

Accordingly, Defendant A, who was a street victim in front of Defendant A, was fluored with H’s arms by hand, and the police officer I conspiredd with Defendant A to arrest Defendant A, and assaulted I’s external fluoral fluor by cutting off I’s external fluor with the defect that he tried to arrest Defendant A.

Accordingly, Defendant A interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to I and H;

1. E statements;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Seized articles, photographs of the scene of the case, and photographs of the damaged police officer;

1. Reports on internal investigation and investigation reports (verification as to whether a victim I patrols or commits violence);

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to requests for appraisal and replys;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow