Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On September 22, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the business of 2018 Go-Ma573 on September 2, 2018, the Defendant: (a) taken the victims and customers in the said restaurant using his mobile phone in the state of drinking outside the cafeteria operated by the victim C at permanent residence; (b) prevented the victim from taking advantage of his mobile phone; and (c) prevented the victim from taking a disturbance while taking the victim’s bath to the said restaurant; and (d) took police officers called the said restaurant to return to the Defendant; (b) on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s operation of the restaurant by force, such as finding the bicycle in the said restaurant and having the bicycle go back to the entrance of the said cafeteria; and (c) obstructed the victim’s operation of the restaurant by force.
2. The Defendant is in de facto marital relationship with the victim E (V, 53 years of age) from Jun. 2, 2015, with the victim, from Jun. 2, 2015.
At around 12:20 on August 29, 2018, the Defendant heard from G in F at the time of permanent residence run by the Defendant the horses that he drinks from the victim, and broom broom broom broom broom broom broom broom broom broom broom broom broom broom broom broom broom broom broom broom broom broom broom broom bom the victim’s face
As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in the cryp of the cryp that requires treatment for about two weeks.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement of the police statement of E;
1. C’s statement;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each internal investigation and diagnosis report;
1. Relevant Articles 314 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 314 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and order to attend a lecture has been punishable several times for violent crimes in the past. Moreover, the instant crime on October 10, 2014 on the ground that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol again on the ground that he was under the influence of alcohol, even though this court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a period of imprisonment for four months due to an injury.