Text
All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Facts charged;
A. On November 10, 2018, Defendant A committed assault, such as: (a) Defendant A was unable to hold the victim’s face due to the sewerage maintenance works on the roads near C, at C, and due to the sewerage maintenance works; (b) Defendant A used a signal signaler B (the age of 61) to prevent the entry of the vehicle; (c) Defendant A used a dispute with the victim’s face by a bad hand; and (d) Defendant A was able to walk the victim’s body several times due to an outbreak.
B. Defendant B’s Defendant A.
the date, time, place, and place described in the subsection.
During the dispute with the victim A (at the age of 51) as described in the port, he saw the victim's face with his left hand, saw the victim's face with his spath, and assaulted the victim's fighting with the victim's Do (at the age of 19) who was the parent of the victim, who was at the victim's fighting.
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act;
B. On May 2, 2019, the victim B following the prosecution of this case, expressed each of the intent not to punish Defendant A in this court, the victim A’s intent not to punish Defendant B in this court after the prosecution of this case, and the victim D’s intent not to punish Defendant B on May 8, 2019 after the prosecution of this case.
(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;