1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows 2. The part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the determination of the part of the Plaintiff’s assertion added in the court of first instance as set forth in the following 3. Thus, it is acceptable to

2. The 3rd page 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance in which the phrase “each of the above evidence, evidence, and evidence Nos. 2 and 5” was written with “each of the above evidence, evidence Nos. 2 and 5”.

3. Determination on the additional argument

A. Defendant C is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 14.3 million (the difference between the agreed rent and the rent actually paid) and KRW 7.7 million, which is the unpaid rent from July 2013 to July 2014 (1.1.1 million per month x 13 months), and the unpaid rent for May 2015. ② The Plaintiff and Defendant C agreed to pay the Plaintiff KRW 25% per annum for the overdue rent in the event that the rent is overdue at the time of concluding the lease agreement on the instant real estate. As such, the Defendant failed to pay part of the rent from July 2013 to November 2015 or paid the Plaintiff KRW 70,000 from July 1, 2013 to December 2013 to December 14, 2013, KRW 30,000,0000 per annum 184,516,714,718,201,57.7.

B. Determination 1) As to the assertion on the part (1) above, the said part of the claim was changed to KRW 7,00,000 per month from July 2013 to KRW 6,50,000 per month from June 2015, and the Defendant C paid all the rent (including value-added tax) from July 2013 to July 2014, as seen earlier. In addition, the said part of the claim was changed to KRW 770,00 per month from July 2013 to July 2014.