logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.12.24 2014고단4306
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a vehicle B with a vehicle.

Around 07:50 on October 5, 2014, the Defendant driven a car with the upper body on the upper body, and went to the left at approximately 20 km of the Seo-gu Seosung-dong, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, to the west-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, the oriental medical hospital.

At this point, since the distance crossing where a signal, etc. is installed, in such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to observe the signal and prevent an accident, despite the fact that there was a duty of care to prevent the accident, and due to negligence on the left-hand turn on the red signal in violation of the signal, the victim C (the 58-year-old driver) who was under normal process in accordance with the new code was placed in front of the right-hand part of the driver's car by the defendant's body-wide driver's left-hand part of the driver's car.

The Defendant, by occupational negligence, caused the above victim to suffer injury, such as light fluoral salt, etc. requiring treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, destroyed the fluoring car owned by the victim E with approximately KRW 1,225,552, and escaped without immediately stopping the car and taking other measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Optional fine;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in the workhouse: The defendant is driving the vehicle on the part of the defendant that the defendant reflects the crime of this case.

The victim C does not want to punish the defendant at all.

arrow